DEV Community

Cover image for The Liskov Substitution Principle, A Model for Parenting
CamiloEderson
CamiloEderson

Posted on

The Liskov Substitution Principle, A Model for Parenting

Maybe it’s just me, but most software principles sound abstract until you realize they already exist in real life 🌱

While studying the SOLID principles, I noticed that one of the clearest examples is the Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) β€” a core concept in object-oriented design β€” which maps surprisingly well to parenting and family expectations πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦

πŸ” What LSP Says (in simple terms)

In software, LSP states:

If a class B is a subtype of class A, objects of type A should be replaceable with objects of type B without breaking the behavior expected by the client.

In plain terms:

If you make a promise at a higher level, every specific case must be able to honor it 🀝

Now replace:

  • class β†’ child πŸ‘Ά
  • client β†’ family 🏠

Suddenly, the principle becomes very human.

πŸ‘ͺ Parents, Promises, and Abstractions

In software, a base class defines expectations.

In a family, parents define rules and responsibilities.

Problems arise when a parent says:

β€œAll my children must do X.”

…but not all children are actually capable of doing X.

When that happens, the child isn’t the problem.

The expectation is. ⚠️

That’s exactly what happens in software when a base class defines behavior that not all subclasses can safely support.

πŸ€₯ When the Parent Is β€œLying”

In programming, we say an abstraction is lying when it promises behavior that isn’t universally valid.

In families, this looks like:

  • Expecting every child to succeed in the same way 🎯
  • Assigning the same responsibilities regardless of age or ability 🧱
  • Punishing children for expectations that never fit them 🚫

In software, the result is broken behavior.

In families, it’s frustration, resentment, and constant conflict πŸ’₯

🧠 The Shared Lesson

Whether you’re designing software or raising a family:

If someone constantly has to say β€œI can’t do that,” the promise was probably wrong.

LSP teaches developers to look upward, not downward β€” to fix the contract instead of blaming the implementation πŸ”„

🌟 Final Thought

Strong systems β€” technical or human β€” are built on clear expectations, honest promises, and respect for differences.

When abstractions are truthful, substitution becomes safe.

When expectations are fair, relationships become healthy πŸ’š

Top comments (0)