DEV Community

Nicolás Gómez Aragón
Nicolás Gómez Aragón

Posted on

Billing in Salesforce

Money, money, money... Raw material to fuel Nations, companies, households and every building, vehicle or infrastructure around us, something so relevant but many times becomes a Hydra for companies, when you solve one issue, you get a new one.

Many companies have aspired to solve billing and provide comprehensive solutions for SMB (Small Medium Businesses) and also for enterprise. In this article, I will be discussing 3 of the existing solutions within Salesforce CRM, including pros and cons, with a final comparison and which one should you choose depending on your use case.

Salesforce CPQ

Configure, Price and Quoting (CPQ), it's a managed package within Salesforce CRM, that since 2015 has been the engine for the Salesforce billing process, together with Billing, introduced in 2018 to improve revenue management capabilities within the platform.

CPQ seeks to enhance Sales Cloud, managing catalogs, pricing configurations, quoting among others, however as a managed package many times falls short and needs extra add-ons to extend its capabilities, its main characteristics are:

  • Configure: customize product selections, including bundling,upselling, cross-selling and dependency rules.

  • Price: automation of complex pricing, with discount calculation, custom pricing, currency conversion and predefined pricing rules.

  • Quote: sales teams can create quoting, generate documents and enhance the sales process as a whole.

With this, Salesforce extended its CRM capabilities to include billing, however, limitations were evident for companies using Salesforce and with this in mind, a new solution came to play in Spring 24'.

Revenue Cloud

In Dreamforce 24', it was presented Revenue Lifecycle Management (RLM), the core product offering Revenue Cloud Advanced (RCA). Its philosophy is to handle the entire revenue lifecycle within Salesforce, adding contracting,fulfillment and billing in one unified platform. As RevCloud is built on top of Einstein platform, it's a more out of the box solution, not just a managed package, but rather something native from Salesforce.

Some of the most relevant features of Revenue are:

  1. Advanced API Architecture Providing headless API to interact with data in a smoother way, allowing intercommunication between multiple applications in an easy manner.

As an overview the advantages to it are:

We have here a more detailed comparison feature by feature:

Conga, Kugamon, Nue.io, etc

Many companies have entered to this billing ecosystem and have had a great impact on the platform, some of them are:

Conga

After the merger of Apttus (CPQ and Quote-to-Cash) and Conga (document generation) in 2020, it became a large RLM platform that includes CPQ, Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), document generation with E-signature and billing.

Being one of the biggest players in the ecosystem specially for complex enterprise requirements, excelling at document generation, strong CLM capabilities, support for Salesforce and other platforms, despite the complex implementation, requirement for skilled professionals and pricing.

Kugamon

Native on Salesforce, offering CPQ, subscriptions, billing and order management, emphasizing fast performance, easy administration and strong customer support.

Becoming a more lightweight option built entirely on Salesforce, with easier implementation and more versatile for administrators, suited for mid-market and scaling companies.

Nue.io

Focused that specializes in power-up Salesforce and make the platform capable of handling hybrid pricing, analytics and many other advanced features, specializing in high growth SaaS (Software as a Service) companies and usage based pricing.

Advantages of Nue is the easy UI/UX for users, making it agile and versatile for companies, being a low code platform that any Salesforce Administrator would be able to use and deploy easily.

Comparison

Solution Best For Key Strengths Main Limitations
Salesforce CPQ + Billing Existing Salesforce customers with mature implementations Proven, highly customizable, large talent pool Complex managed package, slower innovation
Revenue Cloud Advanced Companies adopting Salesforce's newest architecture Native platform, APIs, AI-ready, future roadmap Newer product, fewer experienced consultants
Conga Large enterprises with heavy contract and document needs Best-in-class CLM and document automation Expensive and implementation-heavy
Kugamon Mid-market companies seeking a native Salesforce solution Lightweight, fast, admin-friendly Smaller ecosystem and fewer consultants
Nue.io SaaS and usage-based pricing businesses Modern UI, hybrid pricing, subscription-focused Best suited for software companies rather than all industries

Conclusions

To close this article, we can conclude that billing is one of the most critical and complex processes in any organization. While generating an invoice may appear simple, the underlying reality often involves pricing models, subscription changes, contract amendments, taxation, revenue recognition, and integrations with ERP and payment systems.

Salesforce has evolved significantly in this space.
Salesforce CPQ and Billing laid the foundation and remain a reliable choice for organizations with established implementations and experienced teams. However, its managed-package architecture can introduce complexity and maintenance overhead.

Revenue Cloud Advanced represents Salesforce's long-term strategic direction. Built natively on the platform and powered by API-first architecture, it offers a more flexible and scalable foundation for organizations investing in modern revenue operations.

Conga stands out for enterprises that require sophisticated contract lifecycle management, document generation, and cross-platform support. It is particularly attractive when legal and contracting processes are as important as billing itself.

Kugamon offers a practical, lightweight alternative that remains entirely native to Salesforce. Its simplicity and ease of administration make it especially appealing for mid-sized businesses and organizations seeking faster deployments.

Nue.io is an excellent choice for high-growth SaaS companies that depend on subscriptions, consumption-based pricing, and rapid experimentation with monetization models.
Which Solution Should You Choose?

  • Choose Salesforce CPQ + Billing if you already have a stable implementation and do not need a full re-architecture.
  • Choose Revenue Cloud Advanced if you are building a future-proof revenue platform aligned with Salesforce's strategic roadmap.
  • Choose Conga if contract lifecycle management and document automation are core business priorities.
  • Choose Kugamon if you want a native Salesforce solution with lower complexity and faster deployment.
  • Choose Nue.io if your business relies on subscription, usage-based, or hybrid SaaS pricing.

There is no universal winner, the best billing platform is the one that aligns with your pricing model, operational complexity, growth plans, and implementation capabilities, because in the end, billing is not just about collecting money—it is about transforming revenue into a scalable and predictable business engine.

Top comments (0)